![]() ![]() Firefox users who did not want to use Pocket had to remove it manually from the browser. Mozilla is about choice, as the organization notes, but it did not give users of the browser any choice when it integrated Pocket natively in it. Firefox users could then remove the add-on easily if they did not need it. Or, Mozilla could have deployed Pocket as a browser add-on directly instead. Users could then decide whether to install the add-on or not. For instance, instead of integrating Pocket natively in Firefox, it could have displayed a notification to users advertising it. If you look at the pro arguments, you may notice rather quickly that Mozilla could have selected a different method of integration. ![]() Mozilla is working on Reader Mode which it could easily improve to add read it later functionality to it natively without relying on third-party services.It is likely that the majority of Firefox users are not interested in Pocket. Pocket has been available as an add-on before that users could install.While Mozilla's implementation may be open source, Pocket itself is proprietary.Users who don't want to use Pocket need to remove it from the browser or ignore it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |